deniserutledge

Modern smartphones not only do an excellent job with such basic tasks as calls, mail, messengers, and the search for useful information, but they are also quite capable of replacing some other devices, such as a camera and a camera. Of course, they are still far from professional mirror technology, but even miniature devices of 4 inches can successfully compete with a conventional soapbox. Although there are no outstanding camera phones among inexpensive small diagonal smartphones that can be compared with mobile photo gurus like Apple or Samsung, among them you can find models with a 5-megapixel camera and good color reproduction.

3 BQ 4001G COOL

Although this development in 2019 is almost identical in terms of hardware, durability and size to earlier BQ models and even to many smartphones of the same diagonal from other manufacturers, the Cool model attracted the attention of the public, especially children and their parents. After all, the lack of functional and system chips pays for an affordable price and ultrafashionable design of the case. Smooth, but not too slippery, this smartphone has a slightly convex shape, making it comfortable to hold in your hand. A nice bonus was the appearance of the main camera, which is very similar to the camera of the latest apple developments. At the same time, BQ makes good photos with a resolution of 5 megapixels, if taken in sufficient light. Also buy iPhone tempered glass screen protector.

An equally important advantage for some users, especially young ones, was the ability to choose from a wide range of shades. The smartphone is available not only in classic black, but also in blue, red and olive.

2 BQ 4072 STRIKE MINI

The basic smartphone of domestic production stands out favorably against the background of other budget devices with the latest Android operating system Android 7 and normal quality for small money. Since the Strike Mini belongs to the ultra-economy class, wonders like 4G and NFC should not be expected from it. Nevertheless, a 4-inch smartphone was loved by many users by a decent battery, a battery saving function, 1 GB of RAM and the best for the budget category of the rear and front cameras for 5 and 2 megapixels, respectively.

Especially often in reviews, they praise the main camera, which allows you to make very good photos for such a profitable and compact device. Of course, in terms of pictures, BQ is inferior to large expensive smartphones and good cameras, but among miniature state employees, it really has no equal in case lost your Phone. At the same time, despite the average battery capacity, with a small load, the device holds a charge for a couple of days.

1 ZTE BLADE L130

During its history, the famous Chinese brand ZTE presented the world with a lot of successful economy-class equipment, including the latest 4-inch smartphone. Although unlike the larger developments of this company, the Blade L130 model cannot boast the best battery life, it has many advantages, including not only quite clear cameras, but 8 GB of internal memory, as well as the most current operating system. After all, this smartphone is equipped with the latest version of Android 9 called Go edition. This system was designed specifically for low-end models and helps optimize and significantly improve the operation of the device. At the same time, being a recent invention, Android 9 will be updated regularly, which distinguishes it from the outdated versions that are often found on cheap gadgets.

I am a video blogger, and I am very sensitive to the quality of my video, and the quality of my sound. In order for the sound to be of lower quality, I bought a buttonhole.

The fact is that I can write sound to the built-in microphones in my camcorder. The sound quality is good, but the fact is that I can move a little, move farther, come closer, the sound is always different, and I think it will strain my user, my viewer very much, I don’t want it, so first of all I bought a lavalier microphone. Initially, I bought myself a buttonhole Audio-Technica ATR3350. 

I immediately rejected it, it's a disgusting buttonhole, I bought it for $ 30, and I think that $ 30 is not worth it. This is a bad buttonhole. Why did I buy Audio-Technica? I thought it was a less good company, and they should do normal things. I’m used to that if it’s something Chinese, I’m usually crying for it, I’m buying cheap stuff, but I’m getting bullshit when I buy something brand-name, I’m paying more than this cheap stuff, but I get something good. In this case, I bought a branded Audio-Technica, but I got garbage. Now you see the remnants of this Audio-Technica. 

That is, I only have a clothes clip from Audio-Technica, and the body of the buttonhole itself. The internal microphone is different for me, I have an ordinary capsule which I bought for 30-40 cents, that is, I went to the radio market and bought an ordinary capsule with a diameter of 3 mm. 

It happened because while I reworked and upgraded the Audio-Technica buttonhole, as it was very noisy and strongly fonilla when replacing the wire with a regular Chinese wire, though it is very thick, it is thicker than the wire that was originally on the buttonhole Audio-Technica but he has no background. A little further you will see what it is, and why I rejected all the buttonholes that I bought. From the buttonhole, Audio-Technica remained only this clip and body. Everything else is different.

Even the plug, I originally had a regular plug, but I changed it, because this usual purchase of a collapsible wireless headphones plug may be good, but it’s very bad for a microphone, because I don’t know why, but sometimes what kind of noises, which naturally I did not hear, because just like now I’m talking, and I don’t hear what is happening here, since I don’t listen to myself. After recording the video, I come home, start to mount it, and I hear some kind of noise, sound, some kind of noise on the sound, I do not want this, and I have already set myself an ordinary plug. I seized, made a bandage, as I showed in the video, the link to which you see on the screen. Soldering is much more reliable than the riveting used in the collapsible connector.